22 March 2018
Authors rate SIAC as Most Cost-Competitive and Efficient International Arbitral Institution
In a recent article by CMS Holborn Asia and the Society of International Law (Singapore), titled “Costs and Duration: A Comparison of the HKIAC, LCIA, SCC and SIAC Studies”, the authors concluded that “SIAC remains the most cost-competitive option for both sole-arbitrator and three-arbitrator cases” and that “for three-arbitrator cases in particular, SIAC remains significantly cheaper than LCIA and SCC where the costs extend to six-digit figures”. According to the article, SIAC arbitrations are “the most efficient in comparison to the other arbitral institutions”.
The authors said that they compared the latest figures released by HKIAC, LCIA, SCC and SIAC in their respective costs and duration studies. They presented the following conclusions:
• |
"SIAC remains the most cost-competitive option for both sole-arbitrator and three-arbitrator cases. For three-arbitrator cases in particular, SIAC remains significantly cheaper than LCIA and SCC where the costs extend to six-digit figures.”
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• | “SIAC arbitrations are the most efficient in comparison to the other arbitral institutions. The median duration of an SIAC arbitration is the shortest at 11.7 months.” |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article added that “based on a comparison of the four studies, the costs and duration of arbitral proceedings are ostensibly most attractive when administered by SIAC”.
A copy of the article may be accessed here.
Further details on SIAC’s Costs and Duration Study may be found here.
For more information, please contact:
Singapore International Arbitration Centre
T: +65 6713 9777
E: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
W: www.siac.org.sg